The Synthetic Grass Factor in Las Vegas Landscape Makeovers
Durable turf for kids in Las Vegas: it’s practically playground-proof.
Lowered Upkeep with Synthetic Grass
Synthetic grass has been obtaining popularity among property owners in Las Vegas for its numerous advantages. Making the Best Synthetic Grass Selection for Your Las Vegas Estate . Among the most considerable benefits is the lowered maintenance need, which makes artificial turf a more convenient and cost-effective alternative contrasted to all-natural yard.
Maintaining a natural turf lawn is frequently a taxing and labor-intensive procedure. In the scorching heat of Las Vegas, it comes to be much more complex. The yard needs regular watering, mowing, fertilizing, and weeding to remain healthy and balanced and aesthetically pleasing. If overlooked, the lawn begins to turn yellow or brownish and might even die, which would certainly need reseeding or even total substitute of the lawn.
On the various other hand, artificial turf virtually eliminates these concerns. It stays perfectly eco-friendly and rich throughout the year, regardless of the climate condition. There is no requirement for normal watering, which not only conserves time and effort but also adds to water preservation - a significant concern in locations like Las Las vega. The only water demand would be periodic rinsing to keep it tidy and dust-free.
Furthermore, with artificial turf, there is no requirement for mowing or feeding. It continues to be at the ideal height forever, and theres no danger of it overgrowing or nurturing weeds.
The Synthetic Grass Factor in Las Vegas Landscape Makeovers - Las Vegas turf for HOAs keeps communities beautiful—and complaint-free.
desert landscaping with turf Las Vegas
Las Vegas apartment pet turf: turning patios into puppy playgrounds.
fake grass installation Summerlin
UV protected turf Las Vegas
Synthetic turf maintenance in Las Vegas is so easy, even your teenager could do it.
commercial artificial grass Las Vegas
This not only reduces the time spent on grass upkeep but additionally removes the price of buying and maintaining a lawnmower or buying fertilizers.
Artificial turf is likewise more durable and hard-wearing than all-natural lawn. It can withstand hefty foot traffic and extensive play activities without getting worn or damaged. This indicates you wont have to bother with changing or fixing particular sections of your lawn, which is another typical upkeep task with natural lawn.
The lowered maintenance need with synthetic grass supplies property owners in Las Vegas with even more time to enjoy their exterior rooms, as opposed to spending quality time maintaining them. It also means substantial price financial savings over time. In a city like Las Vegas, where the climate is extreme, synthetic grass shows to be a wise and helpful selection for property owners, offering an evergreen, low-maintenance yard that looks and feels just like natural turf.
Environmental Benefits of Switching to Artificial Turf
As Las Vegas remains to experience the impacts of a transforming environment and boosting water shortage, it is coming to be critical for citizens and services to find ingenious methods to save water. One such method is through the fostering of synthetic grass or synthetic grass. This choice not just uses aesthetic charm and low upkeep yet also brings considerable ecological advantages.
Among one of the most noticeable environmental benefits of changing to synthetic grass is water conservation. Traditional turf lawns require a hefty quantity of water to remain green and healthy, especially in the desert environment of Las Las vega. According to the Southern Nevada Water Authority, each square foot of natural lawn replaced by synthetic grass conserves 55 gallons of water each year. For that reason, by switching over to synthetic grass, Las Vegas homeowners can considerably decrease their water intake, which is important in a city where water is a priceless source.
Artificial turf likewise eliminates the requirement for unsafe chemicals and fertilizers. The majority of natural grass need chemicals, plant foods, and herbicides to maintain their look and health and wellness. These compounds typically permeate right into the ground, polluting the groundwater and affecting the local plants and fauna negatively. With synthetic grass, these chemicals are unnecessary, making it a safer option for the setting.
One more considerable environmental advantage of synthetic grass is its resilience and durability.
The Synthetic Grass Factor in Las Vegas Landscape Makeovers -
Durable turf for kids in Las Vegas: it’s practically playground-proof.
artificial turf landscape designers Las Vegas
No more muddy footprints—synthetic grass for pools in Las Vegas is the splash-proof solution.
Las Vegas turf for HOAs keeps communities beautiful—and complaint-free.
Synthetic lawn design in Las Vegas is how your neighbors get lawn envy.
Unlike natural yard, synthetic grass does not need reseeding or substitute as a result of weather modifications. This durability lowers the sources used for the continuous maintenance and replacement of natural yard.
In terms of air quality, man-made turf supplies clear advantages also. Conventional yards require regular mowing, which launches toxins right into the environment. The U.S Environmental Protection Agency notes that gas-powered lawn mowers add considerably to air contamination. With synthetic grass, no mowing is required, eliminating these discharges entirely.
Finally, synthetic grass assists fight dirt disintegration. In locations where the dirt is prone to erosion, particularly in desert climates like Las Las vega, artificial turf can offer much-needed stability.
The Synthetic Grass Factor in Las Vegas Landscape Makeovers - Durable turf for kids in Las Vegas: it’s practically playground-proof.
Las Vegas fake grass for events brings the glam without the mud.
Las Vegas event turf rentals bring green glam to your special day.
The support product on synthetic grass helps keep soil in place, protecting against disintegration and advertising far better ecological health.
Finally, the switch to synthetic grass in Las Las vega provides several environmental advantages.
The Synthetic Grass Factor in Las Vegas Landscape Makeovers - Durable turf for kids in Las Vegas: it’s practically playground-proof.
Artificial lawn care in Las Vegas means less raking, more relaxing.
Las Vegas pet turf installation turns your backyard into a canine paradise.
eco-friendly turf North Las Vegas
Las Vegas fake grass for events
From water conservation to air quality enhancement, synthetic grass confirms to be a feasible, eco-friendly service, especially in areas coming to grips with water deficiency and climate adjustment. As Las Vegas citizens remain to look for ways to decrease their ecological footprint, the fostering of synthetic grass will likely come to be a significantly preferred option.
Convenience and Aesthetic Appeal of Artificial Turf in Las Las Vega
Artificial turf, commonly referred to as artificial turf, has gotten tremendous popularity in the arid, desert city of Las Las vega. In a city where natural lawn is testing to expand and preserve because of water scarcity and extreme warmth, artificial turf offers an appealing and functional option. The versatility and visual charm of synthetic grass are amongst the leading ten benefits of using this synthetic surface area in Las Vegas.
Allows begin by reviewing the adaptability of artificial turf. One of the primary benefits of synthetic grass is that it can be installed anywhere, no matter the environment or surface. This is especially helpful in Las Las vega, where the atmosphere is not conducive to the growth of all-natural grass. Artificial turf can be installed on roofs, patios, around swimming pool locations, pet runs, sporting activities fields, and play areas, to name a few. It is also a favored option for fairway and bowling environment-friendlies as a result of its also, smooth surface. This versatility implies you can have a lush, green grass all year round, irrespective of the weather condition or water constraints.
Another significant advantage of synthetic grass is its aesthetic allure. Unlike natural lawn, synthetic grass remains dynamic and environment-friendly throughout the year, boosting the appearance of your home or company. It offers a clean, nicely manicured look that is tough to achieve with all-natural turf, especially in a desert climate. The synthetic grass available today is developed to look like real turf, making it nearly equivalent from the real thing. In addition, it does not fade under sunlight or transform brown throughout droughts, guaranteeing your yard looks eye-catching and welcoming in all times.
Moreover, artificial turf can be tailored to match your specific demands. It is offered in various colors, lengths, and structures, enabling you to develop an unique and personalized outdoor space. Whether you want a soft, luxurious yard for your youngsters to play on or a durable, hard-wearing surface for high-traffic areas, there is a synthetic grass item to meet your requirements.
To conclude, the versatility and aesthetic charm of synthetic grass make it an excellent option for homes and organizations in Las Vegas. Not only does it use a useful, low-maintenance option to all-natural grass, yet it also boosts the look of your property, making it much more enticing and welcoming.
The Synthetic Grass Factor in Las Vegas Landscape Makeovers - No more muddy footprints—synthetic grass for pools in Las Vegas is the splash-proof solution.
durable fake grass Sunrise Manor
A residential turf contractor in Las Vegas knows how to turn meh into marvelous.
So, if youre taking into consideration updating your outside space, synthetic grass could be the best solution.
Durability and Sturdiness: Exactly How Artificial Turf Outlives Natural Turf
When it pertains to the durability and longevity of lawn, artificial turf plainly beats its natural equivalent. This is specifically noticeable in a city like Las Vegas, where the extreme desert environment can ruin all-natural grass. In contrast, artificial turf remains vibrant and lush all year round, regardless of weather. This essay seeks to highlight exactly how synthetic grass outlasts all-natural turf, hence making it one of the leading benefits of using artificial turf in Las Las vega.
All-natural grass calls for a great deal of maintenance to keep it looking fresh and environment-friendly. It needs regular watering, mowing, fertilizing, and re-seeding. Despite all this care, it can still succumb to diseases, parasites, and the scorching Las Vegas warmth. The durability of all-natural grass is frequently compromised by these elements, bring about a worn-out and uneven lawn that is neither appealing nor practical.
On the other hand, synthetic grass, also known as synthetic grass, supplies premium toughness and long life. It is made from top notch, long lasting products that can hold up against hefty foot web traffic, extreme heat, and various other severe conditions. This indicates that it continues to be undamaged and dynamic for years, calling for little to no upkeep. In fact, many synthetic grass is designed to last for over a decade, which is substantially longer than what can be anticipated from all-natural turf.
Another crucial variable that contributes to the durability of artificial turf is its resistance to insects and conditions. Unlike natural yard, synthetic grass does not offer an environment for insects, neither does it suffer from usual lawn conditions. This eliminates the requirement for chemicals and fungicides, decreasing both maintenance costs and ecological influence.
Furthermore, synthetic grass does not need watering to stay green. This is a substantial advantage in a desert city like Las Vegas, where water is a precious source. By opting for artificial turf, property owners can minimize their water costs and contribute to water conservation efforts.
Last but not least, synthetic grass can endure the deterioration of sports and other leisure tasks better than all-natural grass. It uses a constant playing surface area that does not get muddy or develop divots, making it perfect for sporting activities areas and play grounds.
To conclude, the longevity and durability of artificial turf far go beyond that of natural grass, making it a useful and affordable choice for Las Las vega citizens. Its immune to severe weather, bugs, and illness, and it does not need watering or routine upkeep. Whether for a backyard, a sports field, or a public park, artificial turf assures a green and rich surface
About Las Vegas
Las Vegas, informally referred to as Las vega, is the most populous city in the U. S. state of Nevada and the county seat of Clark Area. The Las Las vega Valley metropolitan area is the largest within the higher Mojave Desert, and second-largest in the Southwestern USA. According to the USA Demographics Bureau, the city had 641,903 homeowners in 2020, with a city population of 2,227,053, making it the 24th-most heavily populated city in the United States. Las Las vega is a globally renowned significant hotel city, understood primarily for its betting, buying, fine eating, enjoyment, and nightlife. It has most locations fixated downtown Las Las vega and more to the Las Las vega Strip, located outside city limits in the unincorporated communities of Heaven and Winchester. The Las Vegas Valley serves as the leading monetary, business, and cultural facility in Nevada. Las Vegas was cleared up in 1905 and officially incorporated in 1911. At the close of the 20th century, it was one of the most booming North American city established within that century (a similar distinction was earned by Chicago in the 19th century). Population growth has actually accelerated because the 1960s and right into the 21st century, and in between 1990 and 2000 the populace raised by 85. 2%. The city expenses itself as the Entertainment Capital of the World, and is popular for its elegant and huge casino-hotels. As of 2023, Las Las vega draws in over 40. 8 million site visitors annually, making it one of the most checked out cities in the USA and constantly ranking among the world's top visitor destinations. It is the third most popular U. S. destination for business conventions and a worldwide leader in the hospitality industry. The city's tolerance for many kinds of adult enjoyment has made it the label "Wrong City", and has actually made it a prominent setting for films, literature, tv programs, commercials and video.
.
About Artificial turf
Surface of synthetic fibers made to look like natural grass
Artificial turf with rubber crumb infillSide view of artificial turfDiagram of the structure of modern artificial turfArtificial turf square mats
Artificial turf is a surface of synthetic fibers made to look like natural grass, used in sports arenas, residential lawns and commercial applications that traditionally use grass. It is much more durable than grass and easily maintained without irrigation or trimming, although periodic cleaning is required. Stadiums that are substantially covered and/or at high latitudes often use artificial turf, as they typically lack enough sunlight for photosynthesis and substitutes for solar radiation are prohibitively expensive and energy-intensive. Disadvantages include increased risk of injury especially when used in athletic competition, as well as health and environmental concerns about the petroleum and toxic chemicals used in its manufacture.
Artificial turf first gained substantial attention in 1966, when ChemGrass was installed in the year-old Astrodome, developed by Monsanto and rebranded as AstroTurf, now a generic trademark (registered to a new owner) for any artificial turf.
The first-generation system of shortpile fibers without infill of the 1960s has largely been replaced by two more. The second features longer fibers and sand infill and the third adds recycled crumb rubber to the sand. Compared to earlier systems, modern artificial turf more closely resembles grass in appearance and is also considered safer for athletic competition. However, it is still not widely considered to be equal to grass. Sports clubs, leagues, unions and individual athletes have frequently spoken out and campaigned against it, while local governments have enacted and enforced laws restricting and/or banning its use.
David Chaney, who moved to Raleigh, North Carolina, in 1960 and later served as Dean of the North Carolina State University College of Textiles, headed the team of Research Triangle Park researchers who created the first notable artificial turf. That accomplishment led Sports Illustrated to declare Chaney as the man "responsible for indoor major league baseball and millions of welcome mats."
Artificial turf was first installed in 1964 on a recreation area at the Moses Brown School in Providence, Rhode Island.[1] The material came to public prominence in 1966, when AstroTurf was installed in the Astrodome in Houston, Texas.[1] The state-of-the-art indoor stadium had attempted to use natural grass during its initial season in 1965, but this failed miserably and the field conditions were grossly inadequate during the second half of the season, with the dead grass painted green. Due to a limited supply of the new artificial grass, only the infield was installed before the Houston Astros' home opener in April 1966; the outfield was installed in early summer during an extended Astros road trip and first used after the All-Star Break in July.
The use of AstroTurf and similar surfaces became widespread in the U.S. and Canada in the early 1970s, installed in both indoor and outdoor stadiums used for baseball and football. More than 11,000 artificial turf playing fields have been installed nationally.[2] More than 1,200 were installed in the U.S. in 2013 alone, according to the industry group the Synthetic Turf Council.[2]
Tropicana Field with its artificial turf field.An artificial-turf field at a high school in Oregon.
Artificial turf was first used in Major League Baseball in the Houston Astrodome in 1966, replacing the grass field used when the stadium opened a year earlier. Even though the grass was specifically bred for indoor use, the dome's semi-transparent Lucite ceiling panels, which had been painted white to cut down on glare that bothered the players, did not pass enough sunlight to support the grass. For most of the 1965 season, the Astros played on green-painted dirt and dead grass.
The solution was to install a new type of artificial grass on the field, ChemGrass, which became known as AstroTurf. Given its early use, the term astroturf has since been genericized as a term for any artificial turf.[3] Because the supply of AstroTurf was still low, only a limited amount was available for the first home game. There was not enough for the entire outfield, but there was enough to cover the traditional grass portion of the infield. The outfield remained painted dirt until after the All-Star Break. The team was sent on an extended road trip before the break, and on July 19, 1966, the installation of the outfield portion of AstroTurf was completed.
The Chicago White Sox became the first team to install artificial turf in an outdoor stadium, as they used it only in the infield and adjacent foul territory at Comiskey Park from 1969 through 1975.[4] Artificial turf was later installed in other new multi-purpose stadiums such as Pittsburgh's Three Rivers Stadium, Philadelphia's Veterans Stadium, and Cincinnati's Riverfront Stadium. Early AstroTurf baseball fields used the traditional all-dirt path, but starting in 1970 with Cincinnati's Riverfront Stadium,[5] teams began using the "base cutout" layout on the diamond, with the only dirt being on the pitcher's mound, batter's circle, and in a five-sided diamond-shaped "sliding box" around each base. With this layout, a painted arc would indicate where the edge of the outfield grass would normally be, to assist fielders in positioning themselves properly. The last stadium in MLB to use this configuration was Rogers Centre in Toronto, when they switched to an all-dirt infield (but keeping the artificial turf) for the 2016 season.[6][7]
Artificial turf being installed on a baseball field in Queens, New York City.
The biggest difference in play on artificial turf was that the ball bounced higher than on real grass and also traveled faster, causing infielders to play farther back than they would normally so that they would have sufficient time to react. The ball also had a truer bounce than on grass so that on long throws fielders could deliberately bounce the ball in front of the player they were throwing to, with the certainty that it would travel in a straight line and not be deflected to the right or left. The biggest impact on the game of "turf", as it came to be called, was on the bodies of the players. The artificial surface, which was generally placed over a concrete base, had much less give to it than a traditional dirt and grass field did, which caused more wear-and-tear on knees, ankles, feet, and the lower back, possibly even shortening the careers of those players who played a significant portion of their games on artificial surfaces. Players also complained that the turf was much hotter than grass, sometimes causing the metal spikes to burn their feet or plastic ones to melt. These factors eventually provoked a number of stadiums, such as the Kansas City Royals' Kauffman Stadium, to switch from artificial turf back to natural grass.
In 2000, St. Petersburg's Tropicana Field became the first MLB field to use a third-generation artificial surface, FieldTurf. All other remaining artificial turf stadiums were either converted to third-generation surfaces or were replaced entirely by new natural grass stadiums. In a span of 13 years, between 1992 and 2005, the National League went from having half of its teams using artificial turf to all of them playing on natural grass. With the replacement of Minneapolis's Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome by Target Field in 2010, only two MLB stadiums used artificial turf from 2010 through 2018: Tropicana Field and Toronto's Rogers Centre. This number grew to three when the Arizona Diamondbacks switched Chase Field to artificial turf for the 2019 season; the stadium had grass from its opening in 1998 until 2018, but the difficulty of maintaining the grass in the stadium, which has a retractable roof and is located in a desert city, was cited as the reason for the switch.[8] In 2020, Miami's Marlins Park (now loanDepot Park) also switched to artificial turf for similar reasons, while the Texas Rangers' new Globe Life Field was opened with an artificial surface, as it is also a retractable roof ballpark in a hot weather city; this puts the number of teams using synthetic turf in MLB at five as of 2023.
In 2002, CenturyLink Field, originally planned to have a natural grass field, was instead surfaced with FieldTurf upon positive reaction from the Seattle Seahawks when they played on the surface at their temporary home of Husky Stadium during the 2000 and 2001 seasons. This would be the first of a leaguewide trend taking place over the next several seasons that would not only result in teams already using artificial surfaces for their fields switching to the new FieldTurf or other similar surfaces but would also see several teams playing on grass adopt a new surface. (The Indianapolis Colts' RCA Dome and the St. Louis Rams' Edward Jones Dome were the last two stadiums in the NFL to replace their first-generation AstroTurf surfaces for next-generation ones after the 2004 season). For example, after a three-year experiment with a natural surface, Giants Stadium went to FieldTurf for 2003, while M&T Bank Stadium added its own artificial surface the same year (it has since been removed and replaced with a natural surface, which the stadium had before installing the turf). Later examples include Paul Brown Stadium (now Paycor Stadium), which went from grass to turf in 2004; Gillette Stadium, which made the switch in 2006;[9] and NRG Stadium, which did so in 2015. As of 2021, 14 NFL fields out of 30 are artificial. NFL players overwhelmingly prefer natural grass over synthetic surfaces, according to a league survey conducted in 2010. When asked, "Which surface do you think is more likely to shorten your career?", 90% responded artificial turf.[10] When players were asked "Is the Turf versus Grass debate overblown or a real concern"[11] in an anonymous player survey, 83% believe it is a real concern while 12.3% believe it is overblown.
Following receiver Odell Beckham Jr.'s injury during Super Bowl LVI, other NFL players started calling for turf to be banned since the site of the game, SoFi Stadium, was a turf field.[12]
Arena football is played indoors on the older short-pile artificial turf.
The first professional Canadian football stadium to use artificial turf was Empire Stadium in Vancouver, British Columbia, then home of the Canadian Football League's BC Lions, which installed 3M TartanTurf in 1970. Today, eight of the nine stadiums in the CFL currently use artificial turf, largely because of the harsh weather conditions in the latter-half of the season. The only one that does not is BMO Field in Toronto, which initially had an artificial pitch and has been shared by the CFL's Toronto Argonauts since 2016 (part of the endzones at that stadium are covered with artificial turf).[13] The first stadium to use the next-generation surface was Ottawa's Frank Clair Stadium (now TD Place Stadium), which the Ottawa Renegades used when they began play in 2002. The Saskatchewan Roughriders' Taylor Field was the only major professional sports venue in North America to use a second-generation artificial playing surface, Omniturf, which was used from 1988 to 2000, followed by AstroTurf from 2000 to 2007 and FieldTurf from 2007 to its 2016 closure.[14]
Some cricket pitches are made of synthetic grass[15] or of a hybrid of mostly natural and some artificial grass, with these "hybrid pitches" having been implemented across several parts of the United Kingdom[16] and Australia.[17] The first synthetic turf cricket field in the USA was opened in Fremont, California in 2016.[18]
The introduction of synthetic surfaces has significantly changed the sport of field hockey. Since being introduced in the 1970s, competitions in western countries are now mostly played on artificial surfaces. This has increased the speed of the game considerably and changed the shape of hockey sticks to allow for different techniques, such as reverse stick trapping and hitting.
Field hockey artificial turf differs from artificial turf for other sports, in that it does not try to reproduce a grass feel, being made of shorter fibers. This allows the improvement in speed brought by earlier artificial turfs to be retained. This development is problematic for areas which cannot afford to build an extra artificial field for hockey alone. The International Hockey Federation and manufacturers are driving research in order to produce new fields that will be suitable for a variety of sports.
The use of artificial turf in conjunction with changes in the game's rules (e.g., the removal of offside, introduction of rolling substitutes and the self-pass, and to the interpretation of obstruction) have contributed significantly to change the nature of the game, greatly increasing the speed and intensity of play as well as placing far greater demands on the conditioning of the players.
Aspmyra, Norway: home of the football club FK Bodø/GlimtA slide tackle driving up crumbed rubber in the playing surface
The use of artificial turf, and whether they are not allowed or not, varies between different tournaments and time periods. Though grass is preferred in general in association football, artificial turf is found in areas where it is seen as impractical to maintain natural grass season-long, with causes including very cold climates (For instance Norway's Eliteserien) or multi-purpose stadiums (Seattle's Lumen Field).
Some association football clubs in Europe installed synthetic surfaces in the 1980s, which were called "plastic pitches" (often derisively) in countries such as England. There, four professional club venues had adopted them; Queens Park Rangers's Loftus Road (1981–1988), Luton Town's Kenilworth Road (1985–1991), Oldham Athletic's Boundary Park (1986–1991) and Preston North End's Deepdale (1986–1994). QPR had been the first team to install an artificial pitch at their stadium in 1981, but were the first to remove it when they did so in 1988.
Artificial pitches were banned from top-flight (then First Division) football in 1991, forcing Oldham Athletic to remove their artificial pitch after their promotion to the First Division in 1991, while then top-flight Luton Town also removed their artificial pitch at the same time. The last Football League team to have an artificial pitch in England was Preston North End, who removed their pitch in 1994 after eight years in use. Artificial pitches were banned from the top four divisions from 1995.
Artificial turf gained a bad reputation[neutrality is disputed] globally, with fans and especially with players. The first-generation artificial turf surfaces were carpet-like in their look and feel, and thus, a far harder surface than grass and soon became known[by whom?] as an unforgiving playing surface that was prone to cause more injuries, and in particular, more serious joint injuries, than would comparatively be suffered on a grass surface. This turf was also regarded as aesthetically unappealing to many fans[weasel words].
In 1981, London football club Queens Park Rangers dug up its grass pitch and installed an artificial one. Others followed, and by the mid-1980s there were four artificial surfaces in operation in the English league. They soon became a national joke: the ball pinged round like it was made of rubber, the players kept losing their footing, and anyone who fell over risked carpet burns. Unsurprisingly, fans complained that the football was awful to watch and, one by one, the clubs returned to natural grass.[21]
In November 2011, it was reported that a number of English football clubs were interested in using artificial pitches again on economic grounds.[22] As of January 2020, artificial pitches are not permitted in the Premier League or Football League but are permitted in the National League and lower divisions. Bromley are an example of an English football club who currently use a third-generation artificial pitch.[23] In 2018, Sutton United were close to achieving promotion to the Football League and the debate in England about artificial pitches resurfaced again. It was reported that, if Sutton won promotion, they would subsequently be demoted two leagues if they refused to replace their pitch with natural grass.[24] After Harrogate Town's promotion to the Football League in 2020, the club was obliged to install a natural grass pitch at Wetherby Road;[25] and after winning promotion in 2021 Sutton Utd were also obliged to tear up their artificial pitch and replace it with grass, at a cost of more than £500,000.[26] Artificial pitches are permitted in all rounds of the FA Cup competition.
In the 1990s, many North American soccer clubs also removed their artificial surfaces and re-installed grass, while others moved to new stadiums with state-of-the-art grass surfaces that were designed to withstand cold temperatures where the climate demanded it. The use of artificial turf was later banned by FIFA, UEFA and by many domestic football associations, but FIFA and UEFA allowed it again from the mid-2000's (UEFA from the 2005–06 season onwards), provided that the turfs are FIFA Recommended. UEFA has now been heavily involved in programs to test artificial turf, with tests made in several grounds meeting with FIFA approval. A team of UEFA, FIFA and German company Polytan conducted tests in the Stadion Salzburg Wals-Siezenheim in Salzburg, Austria which had matches played on it in UEFA Euro 2008. It is the second FIFA 2 Star approved artificial turf in a European domestic top flight, after Dutch club Heracles Almelo received the FIFA certificate in August 2005.[27] The tests were approved.[28]
FIFA originally launched its FIFA Quality Concept in February 2001.
A full international fixture for the 2008 European Championships was played on October 17, 2007, between England and Russia on an artificial surface, which was installed to counteract adverse weather conditions, at the Luzhniki Stadium in Moscow.[29][30] It was one of the first full international games to be played on such a surface approved by FIFA and UEFA. The latter ordered the 2008 European Champions League final hosted in the same stadium in May 2008 to place on grass, so a temporary natural grass field was installed just for the final.
In 2007, UEFA stressed that artificial turf should only be considered an option where climatic conditions necessitate.[31] One Desso "hybrid grass" product incorporates both natural grass and artificial elements.[32]
FIFA designated a star system for artificial turf fields that have undergone a series of tests that examine quality and performance based on a two star system.[34] Recommended two-star fields may be used for FIFA Final Round Competitions as well as for UEFA Europa League and Champions League matches.[35] There are currently 130 FIFA Recommended 2-Star installations in the world.[36]
In 2009, FIFA launched the Preferred Producer Initiative to improve the quality of artificial football turf at each stage of the life cycle (manufacturing, installation and maintenance).[37] Currently, there are five manufacturers that were selected by FIFA: Act Global, Limonta, Desso, GreenFields, and Edel Grass. These firms have made quality guarantees directly to FIFA and have agreed to increased research and development.
In 2010, Estadio Omnilife with an artificial turf opened in Guadalajara to be the new home of Chivas, one of the most popular teams in Mexico. The owner of Chivas, Jorge Vergara, defended the reasoning behind using artificial turf because the stadium was designed to be "environment friendly and as such, having grass would result [in] using too much water."[38] Some players criticized the field, saying its harder surface caused many injuries. When Johan Cruyff became the adviser of the team, he recommended the switch to natural grass, which the team did in 2012.[39]
The 2015 FIFA Women's World Cup took place entirely on artificial surfaces, as the event was played in Canada, where almost all of the country's stadiums use artificial turf due to climate issues. This plan garnered criticism from players and fans, some believing the artificial surfaces make players more susceptible to injuries. Over fifty of the female athletes protested against the use of artificial turf on the basis of gender discrimination.[40][41]Australia winger Caitlin Foord said that after playing 90 minutes there was no difference to her post-match recovery – a view shared by the rest of the squad. The squad spent much time preparing on the surface and had no problems with its use in Winnipeg. "We've been training on [artificial] turf pretty much all year so I think we're kind of used to it in that way ... I think grass or turf you can still pull up sore after a game so it's definitely about getting the recovery in and getting it right", Foord said.[42] A lawsuit was filed on October 1, 2014, in an Ontario tribunal court by a group of women's international soccer players against FIFA and the Canadian Soccer Association and specifically points out that in 1994 FIFA spent $2 million to plant natural grass over artificial turf in New Jersey and Detroit.[43] Various celebrities showed their support for the women soccer players in defense of their lawsuit, including actor Tom Hanks, NBA player Kobe Bryant and U.S. men's soccer team keeper Tim Howard. Even with the possibility of boycotts, FIFA's head of women's competitions, Tatjana Haenni, made it clear that "we play on artificial turf and there's no Plan B."[44][45]
In UEFA tournaments, teams who are used to playing on artificial turf are seen as having a large home advantage against teams who don't, as was the case for Bodø/Glimt's semi-final campaign in the 2024–25 UEFA Europa League.[48]
Carpet has been used as a surface for indoor tennis courts for decades, though the first carpets used were more similar to home carpets than a synthetic grass. After the introduction of AstroTurf, it came to be used for tennis courts, both indoor and outdoor, though only a small minority of courts use the surface.[49][50] Both infill and non-infill versions are used, and are typically considered medium-fast to fast surfaces under the International Tennis Federation's classification scheme.[49] A distinct form found in tennis is an "artificial clay" surface,[49] which seeks to simulate a clay court by using a very short pile carpet with an infill of the same loose aggregate used for clay courts that rises above the carpet fibers.[49]
Tennis courts such as Wimbledon are considering using an artificial hybrid grass to replace their natural lawn courts. Such systems incorporate synthetic fibers into natural grass to create a more durable surface on which to play.[51] Such hybrid surfaces are currently used for some association football stadiums, including Wembley Stadium.
Synthetic turf can also be used in the golf industry, such as on driving ranges, putting greens and even in some circumstances tee boxes. For low budget courses, particularly those catering to casual golfers, synthetic putting greens offer the advantage of being a relatively cheap alternative to installing and maintaining grass greens, but are much more similar to real grass in appearance and feel compared to sand greens which are the traditional alternative surface. Because of the vast areas of golf courses and the damage from clubs during shots, it is not feasible to surface fairways with artificial turf.
Artificial grass is used to line the perimeter of some sections of some motor circuits, and offers less grip than some other surfaces.[52] It can pose an obstacle to drivers if it gets caught on their car.[53]
Since the early 1990s, the use of synthetic grass in the more arid western states of the United States has moved beyond athletic fields to residential and commercial landscaping.[54] New water saving programs, as of 2019, which grant rebates for turf removal, do not accept artificial turf as replacement and require a minimum of plants.[55][56]
The use of artificial grass for convenience sometimes faces opposition: Legislation frequently seeks to preserve natural gardens and fully water permeable surfaces, therefore restricting the use of hardscape and plantless areas, including artificial turf. In several locations in different countries, homeowners have been fined, ordered to remove artificial turf and/or had to defend themselves in courts. Many of these restrictions can be found in local bylaws and ordinances. These not always applied in a consistent manner,[57][58][59] especially in municipalities that utilize a complaint-based model for enforcing local laws.
Sunlight reflections from nearby windows can cause artificial turf to melt. This can be avoided by adding perforated vinyl privacy window film adhesive to the outside of the window causing the reflection.
Artificial turf has been used at airports.[60] Here it provides several advantages over natural turf – it does not support wildlife, it has high visual contrast with runways in all seasons, it reduces foreign object damage (FOD) since the surface has no rocks or clumps, and it drains well.[61]
Some artificial turf systems allow for the integration of fiber-optic fibers into the turf. This would allow for runway lighting to be embedded in artificial landing surfaces for aircraft (or lighting or advertisements to be directly embedded in a playing surface).[62]
Artificial turf is commonly used for tanks containing octopusses, in particular the Giant Pacific octopus since it is a reliable way to prevent the octopusses from escaping their tank, as they prevent the suction cups on the tentacles from getting a tight seal.[63]
The first major academic review of the environmental and health risks and benefits of artificial turf was published in 2014;[64] it was followed by extensive research on possible risks to human health, but holistic analyses of the environmental footprint of artificial turf compared with natural turf only began to emerge in the 2020s,[65][66] and frameworks to support informed policymaking were still lacking.[67][68] Evaluating the relative environmental footprints of natural and artificial turf is complex, with outcomes depending on a wide range of factors, including (to give the example of a sports field):[64]
what ecosystem services are lost by converting a site to a sports pitch
how resource-intensive is the landscaping work and transport of materials to create a pitch
whether input materials are recycled and whether these are recycled again at the end of the pitch's life
how resource-intensive and damaging maintenance is (whether through water, fertiliser, weed-killer, reapplication of rubber crumb, snow-clearing, etc.)
how intensively the facility is used, for how long, and whether surface type can reduce the overall number of pitches required
Artificial turf has been shown to contribute to global warming by absorbing significantly more radiation than living turf and, to a lesser extent, by displacing living plants that could sequester carbon dioxide through photosynthesis;[69] a study at New Mexico State University found that in that environment, water-cooling of artificial turf can demand as much water as natural turf.[70] However, a 2022 study that used real-world data to model a ten-year-life-cycle environmental footprint for a new natural-turf soccer field compared with an artificial-turf field found that the natural-turf field contributed twice as much to global warming as the artificial one (largely due to a more resource-intensive construction phase), while finding that the artificial turf would likely cause more pollution of other kinds. It promoted improvements to usual practice such as the substitution of cork for rubber in artificial pitches and more drought-resistant grasses and electric mowing in natural ones.[65] In 2021, a Zurich University of Applied Sciences study for the city of Zurich, using local data on extant pitches, found that, per hour of use, natural turf had the lowest environmental footprint, followed by artificial turf with no infill, and then artificial turf using an infill (e.g. granulated rubber). However, because it could tolerate more hours of use, unfilled artificial turf often had the lowest environmental footprint in practice, by reducing the total number of pitches required. The study recommended optimising the use of existing pitches before building new ones, and choosing the best surface for the likely intensity of use.[66] Another suggestion is the introduction of green roofs to offset the conversion of grassland to artificial turf.[71]
Contrary to popular belief, artificial turf is not maintenance free. It requires regular maintenance, such as raking and patching, to keep it functional and safe.[72]
Some artificial turf uses infill such as silicon sand, but most uses granulated rubber, referred to as "crumb rubber". Granulated rubber can be made from recycled car tires and may carry heavy metals, PFAS chemicals, and other chemicals of environmental concern. The synthetic fibers of artificial turf are also subject to degradation. Thus chemicals from artificial turfs leach into the environment, and artificial turf is a source of microplasticspollution and rubber pollution in air, fresh-water, sea and soil environments.[73][74][75][76][77][78][64][excessive citations] In Norway, Sweden, and at least some other places, the rubber granulate from artificial turf infill constitutes the second largest source of microplastics in the environment after the tire and road wear particles that make up a large portion of the fine road debris.[79][80][81] As early as 2007, Environment and Human Health, Inc., a lobby-group, proposed a moratorium on the use of ground-up rubber tires in fields and playgrounds based on health concerns;[82] in September 2022, the European Commission made a draft proposal to restrict the use of microplastic granules as infill in sports fields.[83]
What is less clear is how likely this pollution is in practice to harm humans or other organisms and whether these environmental costs outweigh the benefits of artificial turf, with many scientific papers and government agencies (such as the United States Environmental Protection Agency) calling for more research.[2] A 2018 study published in Water, Air, & Soil Pollution analyzed the chemicals found in samples of tire crumbs, some used to install school athletic fields, and identified 92 chemicals only about half of which had ever been studied for their health effects and some of which are known to be carcinogenic or irritants. It stated "caution would argue against use of these materials where human exposure is likely, and this is especially true for playgrounds and athletic playing fields where young people may be affected".[84] Conversely, a 2017 study in Sports Medicine argued that "regular physical activity during adolescence and early adulthood helps prevent cancer later in life. Restricting the use or availability of all-weather year-round synthetic fields and thereby potentially reducing exercise could, in the long run, actually increase cancer incidence, as well as cardiovascular disease and other chronic illnesses."[85]
The possibility that carcinogenic substances in artificial turf could increase risks of human cancer (the artificial turf–cancer hypothesis) gained a particularly high profile in the first decades of the twenty-first century and attracted extensive study, with scientific reports around 2020 finding cancer-risks in modern artificial turf negligible.[86][87][88][89] But concerns have extended to other human-health risks, such as endocrine disruption that might affect early puberty, obesity, and children's attention spans.[90][91][92][93] Potential harm to fish[75] and earthworm[94] populations has also been shown.
A study for the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection analyzed lead and other metals in dust kicked into the air by physical activity on five artificial turf fields. The results suggest that even low levels of activity on the field can cause particulate matter containing these chemicals to get into the air where it can be inhaled and be harmful. The authors state that since no level of lead exposure is considered safe for children, "only a comprehensive mandated testing of fields can provide assurance that no health hazard on these fields exists from lead or other metals used in their construction and maintenance."[95]
A number of health and safety concerns have been raised about artificial turf.[2] Friction between skin and older generations of artificial turf can cause abrasions and/or burns to a much greater extent than natural grass.[96] Artificial turf tends to retain heat from the sun and can be much hotter than natural grass with prolonged exposure to the sun.[97]
There is some evidence that periodic disinfection of artificial turf is required as pathogens are not broken down by natural processes in the same manner as natural grass. Despite this, a 2006 study suggests certain microbial life is less active in artificial turf.[96]
There is evidence showing higher rates of player injury on artificial turf. By November 1971, the injury toll on first-generation artificial turf had reached a threshold that resulted in congressional hearings by the House subcommittee on commerce and finance.[98][99][100] In a study performed by the National Football League Injury and Safety Panel, published in the October 2012 issue of the American Journal of Sports Medicine, Elliott B. Hershman et al. reviewed injury data from NFL games played between 2000 and 2009, finding that "the injury rate of knee sprains as a whole was 22% higher on FieldTurf than on natural grass. While MCL sprains did not occur at a rate significantly higher than on grass, rates of ACL sprains were 67% higher on FieldTurf."[101]Metatarsophalangeal joint sprain, known as "turf toe" when the big toe is involved, is named from the injury being associated with playing sports on rigid surfaces such as artificial turf and is a fairly common injury among professional American football players. Artificial turf is a harder surface than grass and does not have much "give" when forces are placed on it.[102]
^ abDave Brady, "It's All So Artificial: The Uncommon Ground", Petersen's 12th Pro Football Annual, 1972. Los Angeles: Petersen Publishing Co., 1972; pp. 62–65.
^ abcd
Weeks, Jennifer (2015). "Turf Wars". Distillations Magazine. 1 (3): 34–37. Archived from the original on March 21, 2018. Retrieved March 22, 2018.
^"Definition of Astroturf – Dictionary.com". dictionary.com. Archived from the original on April 18, 2023. Retrieved May 7, 2023. This sense of the word has come to be frequently used as a generic term for any artificial turf (in the same way that other brand names have been genericized, such as xerox). When used this way, it's often seen in lowercase (astroturf).
^"History". Saskatchewan Roughriders. June 12, 2002. Retrieved January 10, 2021. In 1988, the Roughriders replaced the first artificial turf with a new type of system called OmniTurf. Unlike AstroTurf, OmniTurf was an inlay turf system, which relied on 300 tons of sand to hold it in place (rather than the traditional glued-down system). Over the years, a number of problems occurred with this system and it eventually became necessary to replace it prior to its usable age being reached.
^ abcCheng H, Hu Y, Reinhard M (2014). "Environmental and health impacts of artificial turf: a review"(PDF). Environ Sci Technol. 48 (4): 2114–29. doi:10.1021/es4044193. PMID24467230. Archived from the original(PDF) on March 29, 2024. Retrieved July 1, 2023. The major concerns stem from the infill material that is typically derived from scrap tires. Tire rubber crumb contains a range of organic contaminants and heavy metals that can volatilize into the air and/or leach into the percolating rainwater, thereby posing a potential risk to the environment and human health.
^Golden, Leslie M. (2021) "The Contribution of Artificial Turf to Global Warming," Sustainability and Climate Change, December,14 (6) 436-449; http://doi.org/10.1089/scc.2021.0038
^"Microplastics in agricultural soils: A reason to worry?". Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA). February 3, 2017. Archived from the original on April 19, 2017. Retrieved April 19, 2017. Microplastics are increasingly seen as an environmental problem of global proportions. While the focus to date has been on microplastics in the ocean and their effects on marine life, microplastics in soils have largely been overlooked. Researchers are concerned about the lack of knowledge regarding potential consequences of microplastics in agricultural landscapes from application of sewage sludge.
^"Tire wear foremost source of microplastics". IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute. March 29, 2016. Archived from the original on April 19, 2017. Retrieved April 19, 2017. researchers have ranked the sources of microplastic particles by size. The amount of microplastic particles emitted by traffic is estimated to 13 500 tonnes per year. Artificial turf ranks as the second largest source of emissions and is responsible for approximately 2300-3900 tonnes per year.
^Brown, Sc.D., David R. (2007). Artificial Turf(PDF) (Report). The Board of Environment & Human Health, Inc. Archived from the original(PDF) on April 10, 2008. Retrieved December 21, 2007.
^Shalat SL. An evaluation of potential exposures to lead and other metals as the result of aerosolized particulate matter from artificial turf playing fields. 2011. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. http://www.nj.gov/dep/dsr/publications/artificial-turf-report.pdf
^Williams, C. Frank; Pulley, Gilbert E. (2002). Synthetic Surface Heat Studies(PDF) (Report). Brigham Young University. Archived(PDF) from the original on April 10, 2008. Retrieved February 19, 2008.
This article incorporates text by National Center for Health Research available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 license. The text and its release have been received by the Wikimedia Volunteer Response Team
Poly-Turf was a brand of synthetic grass in the very early 1970s, made by American Biltrite of Wellesley, Massachusetts. It was the first especially developed for American football, with a patented layered framework that included a "shock pad" between the synthetic lawn and the asphalt sub-surface. It made use of polypropylene for its fabricated lawn blades, rather than the nylon utilized in AstroTurf and 3M's Tartan Grass.
.
About Rock N Block - Turf N Hardscapes
Driving Directions in
Driving Directions From 36.161101469679, -115.24023784407 to
Driving Directions From 36.204048406654, -115.07060892966 to
Driving Directions From 36.059845804985, -115.11051197402 to
Driving Directions From 36.217321549587, -115.03096451151 to
Driving Directions From 36.179365980183, -115.28172924124 to
Driving Directions From 36.140719909033, -115.13622075405 to
Driving Directions From 36.201297787393, -115.16763237205 to
Driving Directions From 36.034781160289, -115.27339545983 to
Driving Directions From 36.066128369982, -115.2736452018 to
Driving Directions From 36.124641545897, -115.18952369231 to
Driving Directions From 36.123765600262, -115.31049347598 to
Driving Directions From 36.108080542887, -115.29829407827 to
Driving Directions From 36.18728238744, -115.15215232625 to
Driving Directions From 36.095725822184, -115.19702299233 to
Driving Directions From 36.083039086155, -115.04698705795 to
Driving Directions From 36.228462908728, -115.26373302826 to
Driving Directions From 36.233491219118, -115.31233072296 to
Driving Directions From 36.119965600938, -115.04817790431 to
Driving Directions From 36.164916023717, -115.15965924789 to
Driving Directions From 36.042245867959, -115.02695451348 to
Driving Directions From 36.241926641592, -115.34546048619 to
Driving Directions From 36.19937935395, -114.98124591563 to
Driving Directions From 36.042287838954, -115.31268803147 to
Driving Directions From 36.167466952951, -114.96278298368 to
